Friday, October 21, 2016

On the Want of Money Analysis, 10/21/16

     As humanity evolved, both socially and culturally, money has become an important part of people’s lives. One often finds him or herself in the pursuit of it – to have money means to have a place to live in, food to eat, and access to most, if not all, necessities of life. In his essay “On the Want of Money” William Hazlitt, a nineteenth-century English author, developed an analysis of money and how people’s lives revolve around it. He has little appraise of money in the essay, and holds a negative position in its regard. With the use of with the use of diction, humorous tone, and syntactic strategies, Hazlitt argues that it does not matter whether one does or does not have money – in both scenarios, the person will end up unhappy and distressed.   

     Diction plays an important role in the development of Hazlitt’s position on money.  Words with negative associations tied to them are used all throughout the essay. Words such as “scrutinized”, “neglect”, “thrall” and “exile” serve the purpose of evoking feelings of sadness and vulnerability in the audience, and since these words are describing money, money itself becomes something negative.
To develop his position on money, Hazlitt maintains a humorous tone throughout the essay.
Hazlitt makes several joking expressions, “to marry your landlady” and “return home with a liver complaint”. Such use of humor connects Hazlitt with his audience, and as he proceeds with his argument – the want of money controls people’s lives and eventually makes them end up in sorrow and regret – it is taken more seriously.

     In "On the Want of Money" , Hazlitt created one long, extended sentence that reaches for over 40 lines. In this single sentence, he describes one effect of money after the next without slowing down or stopping. Such syntax is symbolic for the struggle that people face when pursuing wealth – one obstacle after the next, the negative effects of money, sorrow, disappointment, regret, keep piling up as the time goes on, and it seems as if there is no end to it.

Saturday, October 8, 2016

Ambien CR Advertisement, 10/9/16

               The Ambien CR advertisement is an interesting work of rhetoric. With the use of ethos, pathos, and logos, this sleeping pill commercial presents a sophisticated visual argument – “this stuff is great, buy it now.”
               A woman wakes up in the middle of the night in a small, empty room. A rooster is sitting in front of her. This bird is symbolic for insomnia – an issue this woman has been struggling with for a while. She gets up and goes to work. The woman just sits there, silently staring at the bird, while her co-workers throw pitiful glances in her way.
               The colors surrounding her are dull, lifeless; the motion of the camera is slow, with long, immobile shots. Everything is constructed in the way to give the viewer a feeling of this woman’s hopelessness. We all have those days when we can’t sleep, or go to bed too late, or wake up too early – it usually feels terrible the next day. The creators of the advertisement play on this tiredness, and as the audience begins to feel bad for the woman on the screen, they utilize pathos as a way to sell the product.
               When Ambien CR pills are finally introduced, the setting immediately changes. The color scheme is now brighter than ever, the woman is smiling and her face looks rested, even rejuvenated. She wakes up in a large room with white walls, and, to her surprise, the rooster is gone. “The pills work!” – says the woman’s facial expression. This detail acts as ethos – “Look how refreshed she looks; we [consumers] want to look (feel) like that too!”
               Logos plays an important role in this advertisement as well. During the clip, narrator describes how this medication works, its benefits, as well as potential side-effects. They don’t lie about possible consequences –dependency, dizziness, depression – and this approach can either attract or scare away consumers. The majority, though, might appreciate the honesty and contact their doctor to find out more.

               Through this advertisement, Ambien CR gives a bit of hope to people who struggle with insomnia. The use of pathos, ethos, and logos is effective and works well with the concept and plot of the commercial, and as a whole, this commercial is a successful visual argument.

Saturday, September 24, 2016

Response to Trump's Speech, 9/24/16

With the presidential election slowly approaching its due date, Americans stand bewildered by the ridiculousness of the two leading candidates -- Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Who's worse? Who's better? Who will lead this country to greatness, and who will set it on fire? While I can't quite answer these questions, I know one thing for certain -- Trump writes (or, at least, presents) far better speeches than Clinton. 

Trump perfectly incorporates the three components of rhetoric: ethos, pathos, and logos. Throughout the speech, he continually develops his ethos as he promotes himself to be the "savior of America." "...Our plan will put America First...My plan...I will..." Furthermore, Trumps heavily criticizes Clinton's agendas (e.g. : "This is the legacy of Hillary Clinton: death, destruction and weakness" ), and by "bringing" her down, he "builds" himself up. With pathos, Trump chose fear as the driving force of his speech. By speaking of murder, terrorism, poverty, Trump makes his audience feel threatened and scared for their lives and the future of America. Overall, the speech sends the message of "If you're scared - vote for me." Finally, Trump brings in statistical data and historical references to develop his logos. "Homicides last year increased by 17% ...Household incomes are down more than $4,000...In 2009, pre-Hillary, ISIS was not even on the map..." Trump lays out the struggles of our nation, then backs them up with statistics , and therefore sways the audience with his reasoning. 

Trump might be a little crazy, but his speech is the Art of Rhetoric at its finest!

Saturday, September 17, 2016

Reflection on Bush's 9/11 Speech , 9/17/16

 After the tragic events of September 11, 2001, George W. Bush needed to address the nation with the words of comfort and encouragement. With a confident, furious tone, he spoke of the horrors that filled the hearts of millions with grief and despair. Throughout his speech, Bush creates a sad, eerie mood with the use of words such as "evil," "terror," "chaos" and "retreat." He "connects" with the audience by putting himself in the "our" and "us." However, to me this speech sounds more violent than it should have been. When people are as vulnerable as they were on that day it is rather easy to play on their emotions, and instead of calming them down, he evokes more fury and anger. Consider this sentence: "A great people has been moved to defend a great nation." This is a call for violence, a call for more blood and destruction. I do not think that this message is what the country needed. Americans had to be united, but not for the intentions of war, but to survive through the pain and pay tribute to the victims.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Introduction, 9/15/16

Hello Ms. Moccia!

How are you doing?
Here is a little something about me.
I like books. And movies.
And cats.
And being alone.


Okbye